I apologize for being an idiot and for doubling your
reflection and work load with no notice whatsoever. I will offer this defense
and apology.
First of all, as you may remember this is my first time
teaching this class and I received the assignment about 10 days before classes
started so I didn’t really have time to think through the semester properly and
certainly didn’t have time to think about how the other half of my job might
usefully inform and contribute to my teaching. And I do really think this will
give you insight into professional writing. That’s the explanation for this
last minute bombshell. By way of apology, if you willingly engage in this
reflection and editing discussion then I will give the entire class a week off
from reflection activities later in the semester when the final project
deadline looms. This way when all is said and done you won’t really be doing
extra work (or at least not much) and really you will be ahead of the game
which is always a good thing.
OK, enough teasing. Here is the bombshell: I want you to
still engage in the Prompt 2 reflection activities you were already assigned
(and many of you have already begun) but I want to add another (bonus) topic.
You will still journal, discuss, and tweet about this topic (so in essence you
will have two journal entries, participate in two discussion board forums, and
post two sets of Tweets this week. I know, I know, that is a lot to ask but
think about it as getting ahead.
I am doing this to you (I’d rather think of it as for you
but I know that’s not how it feels when a teacher drops this sort of bombshell)
because I was working furiously on a grant application (today) and suddenly
realized that this would be a great opportunity for you to see the process from
the inside. I then realized I would be very remiss if I did not grab this
teaching opportunity and use it. Believe me, the last thing I want when
fighting a tight deadline is to stop writing, thinking, and editing to teach
but I’m hoping it will all work out in the end. I hope this work will also
inspire your own thinking in regard to your semester project.
Here is the situation:
My job description at MSU includes teaching two classes
each semester and serving as the Site Director for the Morehead Writing Project
(basically half-time teaching and half-time administrating). As an affiliate of
the National Writing Project, MWP’s mission is to improve the teaching of
writing (although we interpret this to improving literacy instruction as you
cannot really separate reading and writing). We are supported by a mixture of
federal, state, and local grants as well as institutional support (MSU) and our
own program income. Our primary purpose is professional development although we
also run a number of community outreach programs as well. I am currently
engaged in writing a grant for a community outreach project for a program run
by the National Endowment for the Arts called the Big Read. You can read more about
it here: http://www.neabigread.org/about.php
For your journal reflection, I want you to look at the
guidelines and applications instructions: http://www.neabigread.org/guidelines.php
and think about how you would review applications. This review cannot be based
on your personal preferences and interests. It needs to reflect the parameters
and requirements of the Big Read. Specifically look at the criteria and
requirements. What needs to be in there? Don’t simply list the requirements
again but think about what it really is that they are looking for. What buzz
words and ideas will tickle their fancy and/or turn them off, for example. What
will capture their interest? What will make them reject a project? Really think
about what a successful application would look like.
You might also want to reflect on the work that doesn’t
show up on paper. How much groundwork, planning, collaboration, and networking
is essential to prepare an application of this nature? Sure I’m writing it but
there are a whole lot of people involved.
In Blackboard, I will post the narrative and accompanying
documents as I draft them (oh yes, I’m letting it all hang out, and it’s not
pretty) and our discussion will center around your evaluation of those
documents – not as an editor but as someone on the committee reviewing my
application. Where have I gone right, gone wrong, and what do I need to add or
take out or expand upon? This is a real, honest-to-goodness work in progress
and I’m on a real deadline (Feb. 1). This is not a drill.
And, last but not least, do not forget to Tweet!